CodePanel

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol

Reading a 26.2K-token pull request costs $0.1048 on GPT-5.6 Sol, 40× the $0.0026 it costs on Claude Haiku 5.5. Claude Haiku 5.5 is a economy model and GPT-5.6 Sol a frontier one. The benchmark cannot separate their recall: Claude Haiku 5.5 minus GPT-5.6 Sol is −9 pts (95% interval −25 pts to +7 pts).

Side by side

Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-5.6 Sol side by side
FigureClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-5.6 Sol
Price tierEconomyFrontier
Bugs caughtshare of known bugs64%72% (better)
False alarmsper clean PR1.41.2 (better)
Cost per reviewmeasured$0.0038 (better)$0.1127
Cost per bug caught$0.0064 (better)$0.1732
Exact linecatches on the expected lines82%92% (better)
Review timemean15s (better)50s
Typical review calllist price$0.0038 (better)$0.1532
Input / 1M tokens$0.10 (better)$4.00
Output / 1M tokens$0.50 (better)$20.00
Context window1M1.1M

Head to head

The known bugs both were scored on, by who caught each in at least one run.

Of 42 known bugs both were scored on: Both 24Only Claude Haiku 5.5 4Only GPT-5.6 Sol 8Neither 6

By language

Share of known bugs each model caught, by language
ModelAllTypeScript6 bugsGo4 bugsJava4 bugsRust4 bugsC#3 bugsJavaScript3 bugsKotlin3 bugsPHP3 bugsPython3 bugsRuby3 bugsSwift3 bugsC++2 bugsC1 bug
Claude Haiku 5.564%83%75%40%75%67%33%67%100%39%67%67%50%0%
GPT-5.6 Sol72%67%50%69%75%56%100%67%100%100%67%100%50%0%

Where they differ

Of the 42 known bugs both were scored on, both caught 24 and neither caught 6. Claude Haiku 5.5 caught 4 bugs that GPT-5.6 Sol missed: 2 in Go and 2 in TypeScript. GPT-5.6 Sol caught 8 bugs that Claude Haiku 5.5 missed: 2 in Java, 2 in JavaScript, 1 in Go, 1 in Python, 1 in Swift and 1 in TypeScript.

On pull requests with no known bug, Claude Haiku 5.5 raised 1.4 false alarms per review and GPT-5.6 Sol 1.2. A measured review cost $0.0038 on Claude Haiku 5.5, 97% less than $0.1127 on GPT-5.6 Sol.

Each known bug, and how often each model caught it
Pull requestLanguage · kindClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-5.6 Sol
go-gitea/giteaperf(gitdiff): optimize inline diff highlighting using cacheGo · Error handling1/10/1
traefik/traefikAdd the option to define custom cipher suites for backend serversTransportGo · API misuse1/10/1
trpc/trpcfix(server): pass maxDurationMs timeout signal to subscription handlersTypeScript · Concurrency1/10/1
withastro/astroPort Go's csrf protectionTypeScript · Logic1/10/1
TanStack/queryfix(query-core): fix hydration bugs for already resolved promisesTypeScript · Logic0/11/1
aio-libs/aiohttpkeep websocket compression state across interleaved control framesPython · Logic0/11/1
go-chi/chifeat: middleware.ClientIP, a replacement for middleware.RealIPGo · Security0/11/1
jhy/jsoupStore cached child els in Attributes, not fieldJava · Concurrency0/21/6
mockito/mockitoAdd core API to enable Kotlin singleton mockingJava · API misuse0/11/1
pinojs/thread-streamrefactor: replace setTimeout with Atomics.waitAsyncJavaScript · Concurrency0/11/1
pointfreeco/swift-navigationUIKit: Fix switch presented child double dismissSwift · Logic0/11/1
sindresorhus/p-throttleAdd `weight` optionJavaScript · Logic0/11/1

Defects caught over all runs: a PR reviewed three times with one known bug shows 3/3 when it was caught every time.

Every bug each was scored on: Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-5.6 Sol.