CodePanel

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GLM-5.3 (Workers AI)

Reading a 26.2K-token pull request costs $0.0367 on GLM-5.3 (Workers AI), 14× the $0.0026 it costs on Claude Haiku 5.5. Claude Haiku 5.5 is a economy model and GLM-5.3 (Workers AI) a mid-range one. The benchmark cannot separate their recall: Claude Haiku 5.5 minus GLM-5.3 (Workers AI) is +3 pts (95% interval −11 pts to +16 pts).

Side by side

Claude Haiku 5.5 and GLM-5.3 (Workers AI) side by side
FigureClaude Haiku 5.5GLM-5.3 (Workers AI)
Price tierEconomyMid-range
Bugs caughtshare of known bugs64% (better)61%
False alarmsper clean PR1.4 (better)1.9
Cost per reviewmeasured$0.0038 (better)$0.0311
Cost per bug caught$0.0064 (better)$0.0559
Exact linecatches on the expected lines82%85% (better)
Review timemean15s (better)65s
Typical review calllist price$0.0038 (better)$0.0473
Input / 1M tokens$0.10 (better)$1.40
Output / 1M tokens$0.50 (better)$4.40
Context window1M1M

Head to head

The known bugs both were scored on, by who caught each in at least one run.

Of 42 known bugs both were scored on: Both 26Only Claude Haiku 5.5 2Only GLM-5.3 (Workers AI) 10Neither 4

By language

Share of known bugs each model caught, by language
ModelAllTypeScript6 bugsGo4 bugsJava4 bugsRust4 bugsC#3 bugsJavaScript3 bugsKotlin3 bugsPHP3 bugsPython3 bugsRuby3 bugsSwift3 bugsC++2 bugsC1 bug
Claude Haiku 5.564%83%75%40%75%67%33%67%100%39%67%67%50%0%
GLM-5.3 (Workers AI)61%78%19%46%73%48%33%72%44%58%67%100%100%67%

Where they differ

Of the 42 known bugs both were scored on, both caught 26 and neither caught 4. Claude Haiku 5.5 caught 2 bugs that GLM-5.3 (Workers AI) missed: 1 in Go and 1 in PHP. GLM-5.3 (Workers AI) caught 10 bugs that Claude Haiku 5.5 missed: 2 in Java, 1 in C, 1 in C++, 1 in JavaScript, 1 in Kotlin, 1 in Python, 1 in Rust, 1 in Swift and 1 in TypeScript.

On pull requests with no known bug, Claude Haiku 5.5 raised 1.4 false alarms per review and GLM-5.3 (Workers AI) 1.9. A measured review cost $0.0038 on Claude Haiku 5.5, 88% less than $0.0311 on GLM-5.3 (Workers AI).

Each known bug, and how often each model caught it
Pull requestLanguage · kindClaude Haiku 5.5GLM-5.3 (Workers AI)
go-gitea/giteaperf(gitdiff): optimize inline diff highlighting using cacheGo · Error handling1/10/3
symfony/symfony[Security] Allow multiple OIDC discovery endpointsPHP · Security1/10/3
TanStack/queryfix(query-core): fix hydration bugs for already resolved promisesTypeScript · Logic0/13/4
aio-libs/aiohttpkeep websocket compression state across interleaved control framesPython · Logic0/11/4
c-ares/c-aresEvent Thread could stall when not notified of new queries on existing connections that are in a bad stateC · Resource handling0/12/3
ggml-org/llama.cpprpc : cache and reuse compute graphsC++ · Security0/13/3
jhy/jsoupStore cached child els in Attributes, not fieldJava · Concurrency0/22/6
kotest/kotestFix DataClassEq comparatorKotlin · Logic0/12/3
mockito/mockitoAdd core API to enable Kotlin singleton mockingJava · API misuse0/11/4
nushell/nushellreorganize nushell configurationRust · Error handling0/11/4
pinojs/thread-streamrefactor: replace setTimeout with Atomics.waitAsyncJavaScript · Concurrency0/11/3
pointfreeco/swift-navigationUIKit: Fix switch presented child double dismissSwift · Logic0/13/3

Defects caught over all runs: a PR reviewed three times with one known bug shows 3/3 when it was caught every time.

Every bug each was scored on: Claude Haiku 5.5 and GLM-5.3 (Workers AI).