CodePanel

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Argon

Reading a 26.2K-token pull request costs $0.0524 on Gemini 4 Argon, 20× the $0.0026 it costs on Claude Haiku 5.5. Claude Haiku 5.5 is a economy model and Gemini 4 Argon a mid-range one. The benchmark cannot separate their recall: Claude Haiku 5.5 minus Gemini 4 Argon is −18 pts (95% interval −36 pts to −1 pt).

Side by side

Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 4 Argon side by side
FigureClaude Haiku 5.5Gemini 4 Argon
Price tierEconomyMid-range
Bugs caughtshare of known bugs64%82% (better)
False alarmsper clean PR1.41.1 (better)
Cost per reviewmeasured$0.0038 (better)$0.0527
Cost per bug caught$0.0064 (better)$0.0706
Exact linecatches on the expected lines82% (better)78%
Review timemean15s (better)99s
Typical review calllist price$0.0038 (better)$0.0766
Input / 1M tokens$0.10 (better)$2.00
Output / 1M tokens$0.50 (better)$10.00
Context window1M1M

Head to head

The known bugs both were scored on, by who caught each in at least one run.

Of 42 known bugs both were scored on: Both 24Only Claude Haiku 5.5 4Only Gemini 4 Argon 12Neither 2

By language

Share of known bugs each model caught, by language
ModelAllTypeScript6 bugsGo4 bugsJava4 bugsRust4 bugsC#3 bugsJavaScript3 bugsKotlin3 bugsPHP3 bugsPython3 bugsRuby3 bugsSwift3 bugsC++2 bugsC1 bug
Claude Haiku 5.564%83%75%40%75%67%33%67%100%39%67%67%50%0%
Gemini 4 Argon82%83%50%83%75%89%67%100%100%83%100%100%100%0%

Where they differ

Of the 42 known bugs both were scored on, both caught 24 and neither caught 2. Claude Haiku 5.5 caught 4 bugs that Gemini 4 Argon missed: 2 in Go, 1 in JavaScript and 1 in TypeScript. Gemini 4 Argon caught 12 bugs that Claude Haiku 5.5 missed: 2 in Java, 2 in JavaScript, 1 in C++, 1 in C#, 1 in Go, 1 in Kotlin, 1 in Python, 1 in Ruby, 1 in Swift and 1 in TypeScript, most of them logic bugs.

On pull requests with no known bug, Claude Haiku 5.5 raised 1.4 false alarms per review and Gemini 4 Argon 1.1. A measured review cost $0.0038 on Claude Haiku 5.5, 93% less than $0.0527 on Gemini 4 Argon.

Each known bug, and how often each model caught it
Pull requestLanguage · kindClaude Haiku 5.5Gemini 4 Argon
colinhacks/zodfeat(v4): parse input containing reference cyclesTypeScript · Resource handling1/10/1
go-gitea/giteaperf(gitdiff): optimize inline diff highlighting using cacheGo · Error handling1/10/1
golang/gocrypto/tls: add LocalCertificate to ConnectionStateGo · Logic1/10/1
nodejs/undicifeat: add configurable maxPayloadSize for WebSocketJavaScript · Security1/10/1
TanStack/queryfix(query-core): fix hydration bugs for already resolved promisesTypeScript · Logic0/11/1
aio-libs/aiohttpkeep websocket compression state across interleaved control framesPython · Logic0/11/1
dotnet/orleansfix(serialization): cap codec allocationsC# · Logic0/11/1
ggml-org/llama.cpprpc : cache and reuse compute graphsC++ · Security0/11/1
go-chi/chifeat: middleware.ClientIP, a replacement for middleware.RealIPGo · Security0/11/1
jhy/jsoupStore cached child els in Attributes, not fieldJava · Concurrency0/21/2
kotest/kotestFix DataClassEq comparatorKotlin · Logic0/11/1
mockito/mockitoAdd core API to enable Kotlin singleton mockingJava · API misuse0/11/1
pinojs/thread-streamrefactor: replace setTimeout with Atomics.waitAsyncJavaScript · Concurrency0/11/1
pointfreeco/swift-navigationUIKit: Fix switch presented child double dismissSwift · Logic0/11/1
rails/railsReimplement Action Cable redis adapter with redis-clientRuby · Logic0/11/1
sindresorhus/p-throttleAdd `weight` optionJavaScript · Logic0/11/1

Defects caught over all runs: a PR reviewed three times with one known bug shows 3/3 when it was caught every time.

Every bug each was scored on: Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 4 Argon.