Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro reads a 26.2K-token pull request for $0.0328, 17% less than Mistral Medium 3.5 ($0.0393). Above 200K tokens long-context rates apply, and Mistral Medium 3.5 becomes the cheaper one. Both sit in the mid-range price tier, so the choice between them is about review quality more than budget.
Side by side
| Figure | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Typical review calllist price | $0.0574 | $0.0569 (better) |
| Input / 1M tokens | $1.50 | $1.25 (better) |
| Output / 1M tokens | $7.50 (better) | $10.00 |
| Context window | 256K | 1M |
- Above 200K tokens, long-context rates mean Mistral Medium 3.5 is the cheaper of the two.
Not benchmarked yet
Mistral Medium 3.5 and Gemini 2.5 Pro aren't benchmarked yet, so this page compares list prices only. Measured bugs caught, false alarms and a bug-by-bug comparison appear here once both have results.
See measured models