Inkling Small vs DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI)
Inkling Small and DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI) charge practically the same to read a 26.2K-token pull request ($0.0118). Both sit in the economy price tier, so the choice between them is about review quality more than budget.
Side by side
| Figure | Inkling Small | DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI) |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Economy | Economy |
| Bugs caughtshare of known bugs | – | 49% |
| False alarmsper clean PR | – | 1.3 |
| Cost per reviewmeasured | – | $0.0178 |
| Cost per bug caught | – | $0.0309 |
| Exact linecatches on the expected lines | – | 88% |
| Review timemean | – | 137s |
| Typical review calllist price | $0.0147 (better) | $0.0147 |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.45 | $0.44 (better) |
| Output / 1M tokens | $1.20 (better) | $1.32 |
| Context window | – | 1M |
Not benchmarked yet
Inkling Small isn't benchmarked yet, so this page compares list prices only. Measured bugs caught, false alarms and a bug-by-bug comparison appear here once both have results.
See measured models