CodePanel

GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI) vs GPT-6.1 Sol

Reading a 26.2K-token pull request costs $0.0524 on GPT-6.1 Sol, 5.7× the $0.0092 it costs on GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI). GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI) is a economy model and GPT-6.1 Sol a mid-range one. In the benchmark GPT-6.1 Sol caught 49 percentage points more of the known defects than GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI) (95% interval −62 pts to −35 pts, a − b).

Side by side

GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI) and GPT-6.1 Sol side by side
FigureGPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI)GPT-6.1 Sol
Price tierEconomyMid-range
Bugs caughtshare of known bugs40%89% (better)
False alarmsper clean PR2.50.9 (better)
Cost per reviewmeasured$0.0075 (better)$0.0401
Cost per bug caught$0.0189 (better)$0.0514
Exact linecatches on the expected lines49%95% (better)
Review timemean55s28s (better)
Typical review calllist price$0.011 (better)$0.0766
Input / 1M tokens$0.35 (better)$2.00
Output / 1M tokens$0.75 (better)$10.00
Context window128K1.1M

Head to head

The known bugs both were scored on, by who caught each in at least one run.

Of 42 known bugs both were scored on: Both 26Only GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI) 3Only GPT-6.1 Sol 12Neither 1

By language

Share of known bugs each model caught, by language
ModelAllTypeScript6 bugsGo4 bugsJava4 bugsRust4 bugsC#3 bugsJavaScript3 bugsKotlin3 bugsPHP3 bugsPython3 bugsRuby3 bugsSwift3 bugsC++2 bugsC1 bug
GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI)40%42%13%46%71%41%11%44%33%78%33%44%33%0%
GPT-6.1 Sol89%83%75%70%100%89%100%100%100%100%100%100%50%100%

Where they differ

Of the 42 known bugs both were scored on, both caught 26 and neither caught 1. GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI) caught 3 bugs that GPT-6.1 Sol missed: 1 in Go, 1 in Java and 1 in TypeScript, most of them concurrency bugs. GPT-6.1 Sol caught 12 bugs that GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI) missed: 2 in Go, 2 in JavaScript, 1 in C, 1 in C#, 1 in Kotlin, 1 in PHP, 1 in Ruby, 1 in Rust, 1 in Swift and 1 in TypeScript.

On pull requests with no known bug, GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI) raised 2.5 false alarms per review and GPT-6.1 Sol 0.9. A measured review cost $0.0075 on GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI), 81% less than $0.0401 on GPT-6.1 Sol.

Each known bug, and how often each model caught it
Pull requestLanguage · kindGPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI)GPT-6.1 Sol
jhy/jsoupStore cached child els in Attributes, not fieldJava · Concurrency3/60/2
go-gitea/giteaperf(gitdiff): optimize inline diff highlighting using cacheGo · Error handling1/30/1
trpc/trpcfix(server): pass maxDurationMs timeout signal to subscription handlersTypeScript · Concurrency1/30/1
c-ares/c-aresEvent Thread could stall when not notified of new queries on existing connections that are in a bad stateC · Resource handling0/31/1
colinhacks/zodfeat(v4): parse input containing reference cyclesTypeScript · Resource handling0/61/1
dotnet/orleansfix(serialization): cap codec allocationsC# · Logic0/31/1
go-chi/chifeat: middleware.ClientIP, a replacement for middleware.RealIPGo · Security0/31/1
groue/GRDB.swiftDatabaseQueue and DatabaseSnapshot reads can access task localsSwift · Concurrency0/31/1
kotest/kotestFix DataClassEq comparatorKotlin · Logic0/31/1
nodejs/undicifeat: add configurable maxPayloadSize for WebSocketJavaScript · Security0/31/1
nushell/nushellreorganize nushell configurationRust · Error handling0/61/1
rails/railsReimplement Action Cable redis adapter with redis-clientRuby · Logic0/31/1
sindresorhus/p-throttleAdd `weight` optionJavaScript · Logic0/31/1
symfony/symfony[Security] Allow multiple OIDC discovery endpointsPHP · Security0/31/1
traefik/traefikAdd the option to define custom cipher suites for backend serversTransportGo · API misuse0/61/1

Defects caught over all runs: a PR reviewed three times with one known bug shows 3/3 when it was caught every time.

Every bug each was scored on: GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI) and GPT-6.1 Sol.