CodePanel

GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI)

Reading a 26.2K-token pull request costs $0.0524 on GPT-6.1 Sol, 5.7× the $0.0092 it costs on GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI). GPT-6.1 Sol is a mid-range model and GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI) a economy one. In the benchmark GPT-6.1 Sol caught 49 percentage points more of the known defects than GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI) (95% interval +35 pts to +62 pts, a − b).

Side by side

GPT-6.1 Sol and GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI) side by side
FigureGPT-6.1 SolGPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI)
Price tierMid-rangeEconomy
Bugs caughtshare of known bugs89% (better)40%
False alarmsper clean PR0.9 (better)2.5
Cost per reviewmeasured$0.0401$0.0075 (better)
Cost per bug caught$0.0514$0.0189 (better)
Exact linecatches on the expected lines95% (better)49%
Review timemean28s (better)55s
Typical review calllist price$0.0766$0.011 (better)
Input / 1M tokens$2.00$0.35 (better)
Output / 1M tokens$10.00$0.75 (better)
Context window1.1M128K

Head to head

The known bugs both were scored on, by who caught each in at least one run.

Of 42 known bugs both were scored on: Both 26Only GPT-6.1 Sol 12Only GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI) 3Neither 1

By language

Share of known bugs each model caught, by language
ModelAllTypeScript6 bugsGo4 bugsJava4 bugsRust4 bugsC#3 bugsJavaScript3 bugsKotlin3 bugsPHP3 bugsPython3 bugsRuby3 bugsSwift3 bugsC++2 bugsC1 bug
GPT-6.1 Sol89%83%75%70%100%89%100%100%100%100%100%100%50%100%
GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI)40%42%13%46%71%41%11%44%33%78%33%44%33%0%

Where they differ

Of the 42 known bugs both were scored on, both caught 26 and neither caught 1. GPT-6.1 Sol caught 12 bugs that GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI) missed: 2 in Go, 2 in JavaScript, 1 in C, 1 in C#, 1 in Kotlin, 1 in PHP, 1 in Ruby, 1 in Rust, 1 in Swift and 1 in TypeScript. GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI) caught 3 bugs that GPT-6.1 Sol missed: 1 in Go, 1 in Java and 1 in TypeScript, most of them concurrency bugs.

On pull requests with no known bug, GPT-6.1 Sol raised 0.9 false alarms per review and GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI) 2.5. A measured review cost $0.0401 on GPT-6.1 Sol, 5.3× the cost of $0.0075 on GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI).

Each known bug, and how often each model caught it
Pull requestLanguage · kindGPT-6.1 SolGPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI)
c-ares/c-aresEvent Thread could stall when not notified of new queries on existing connections that are in a bad stateC · Resource handling1/10/3
colinhacks/zodfeat(v4): parse input containing reference cyclesTypeScript · Resource handling1/10/6
dotnet/orleansfix(serialization): cap codec allocationsC# · Logic1/10/3
go-chi/chifeat: middleware.ClientIP, a replacement for middleware.RealIPGo · Security1/10/3
groue/GRDB.swiftDatabaseQueue and DatabaseSnapshot reads can access task localsSwift · Concurrency1/10/3
kotest/kotestFix DataClassEq comparatorKotlin · Logic1/10/3
nodejs/undicifeat: add configurable maxPayloadSize for WebSocketJavaScript · Security1/10/3
nushell/nushellreorganize nushell configurationRust · Error handling1/10/6
rails/railsReimplement Action Cable redis adapter with redis-clientRuby · Logic1/10/3
sindresorhus/p-throttleAdd `weight` optionJavaScript · Logic1/10/3
symfony/symfony[Security] Allow multiple OIDC discovery endpointsPHP · Security1/10/3
traefik/traefikAdd the option to define custom cipher suites for backend serversTransportGo · API misuse1/10/6
go-gitea/giteaperf(gitdiff): optimize inline diff highlighting using cacheGo · Error handling0/11/3
jhy/jsoupStore cached child els in Attributes, not fieldJava · Concurrency0/23/6
trpc/trpcfix(server): pass maxDurationMs timeout signal to subscription handlersTypeScript · Concurrency0/11/3

Defects caught over all runs: a PR reviewed three times with one known bug shows 3/3 when it was caught every time.

Every bug each was scored on: GPT-6.1 Sol and GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI).