CodePanel

GPT-6 Luna vs Kimi K2.7 Code (Workers AI)

Reading a 26.2K-token pull request costs $0.0249 on Kimi K2.7 Code (Workers AI), 9.5× the $0.0026 it costs on GPT-6 Luna. GPT-6 Luna is a economy model and Kimi K2.7 Code (Workers AI) a mid-range one. In the benchmark GPT-6 Luna caught 30 percentage points more of the known defects than Kimi K2.7 Code (Workers AI) (95% interval +14 pts to +44 pts, a − b).

Side by side

GPT-6 Luna and Kimi K2.7 Code (Workers AI) side by side
FigureGPT-6 LunaKimi K2.7 Code (Workers AI)
Price tierEconomyMid-range
Bugs caughtshare of known bugs67% (better)38%
False alarmsper clean PR0.7 (better)2.6
Cost per reviewmeasured$0.0028 (better)$0.0567
Cost per bug caught$0.0046 (better)$0.0805
Exact linecatches on the expected lines97% (better)79%
Review timemean29s (better)610s
Typical review calllist price$0.0038 (better)$0.0346
Input / 1M tokens$0.10 (better)$0.95
Output / 1M tokens$0.50 (better)$4.00
Context window1.1M262.1K

Head to head

The known bugs both were scored on, by who caught each in at least one run.

Of 42 known bugs both were scored on: Both 25Only GPT-6 Luna 4Only Kimi K2.7 Code (Workers AI) 8Neither 5

By language

Share of known bugs each model caught, by language
ModelAllTypeScript6 bugsGo4 bugsJava4 bugsRust4 bugsC#3 bugsJavaScript3 bugsKotlin3 bugsPHP3 bugsPython3 bugsRuby3 bugsSwift3 bugsC++2 bugsC1 bug
GPT-6 Luna67%83%25%65%75%56%67%67%67%100%67%100%50%0%
Kimi K2.7 Code (Workers AI)38%75%26%31%46%19%8%14%42%62%33%46%6%40%

Where they differ

Of the 42 known bugs both were scored on, both caught 25 and neither caught 5. GPT-6 Luna caught 4 bugs that Kimi K2.7 Code (Workers AI) missed: 1 in Go, 1 in JavaScript, 1 in Ruby and 1 in Rust. Kimi K2.7 Code (Workers AI) caught 8 bugs that GPT-6 Luna missed: 3 in Go, 1 in C, 1 in Kotlin, 1 in PHP, 1 in Rust and 1 in TypeScript.

On pull requests with no known bug, GPT-6 Luna raised 0.7 false alarms per review and Kimi K2.7 Code (Workers AI) 2.6. A measured review cost $0.0028 on GPT-6 Luna, 95% less than $0.0567 on Kimi K2.7 Code (Workers AI).

Each known bug, and how often each model caught it
Pull requestLanguage · kindGPT-6 LunaKimi K2.7 Code (Workers AI)
denoland/denoperf(libs/core): poll only ready handles and yield between I/O batchesRust · Concurrency1/10/5
go-chi/chifeat: middleware.ClientIP, a replacement for middleware.RealIPGo · Security1/10/8
pinojs/thread-streamrefactor: replace setTimeout with Atomics.waitAsyncJavaScript · Concurrency1/10/8
rails/railsReimplement Action Cable redis adapter with redis-clientRuby · Logic1/10/5
c-ares/c-aresEvent Thread could stall when not notified of new queries on existing connections that are in a bad stateC · Resource handling0/12/5
go-gitea/giteaperf(gitdiff): optimize inline diff highlighting using cacheGo · Error handling0/11/4
golang/gocrypto/tls: add LocalCertificate to ConnectionStateGo · Logic0/12/4
kotest/kotestFix DataClassEq comparatorKotlin · Logic0/11/7
nushell/nushellreorganize nushell configurationRust · Error handling0/12/3
symfony/symfony[Security] Allow multiple OIDC discovery endpointsPHP · Security0/11/4
traefik/traefikAdd the option to define custom cipher suites for backend serversTransportGo · API misuse0/12/7
withastro/astroPort Go's csrf protectionTypeScript · Logic0/13/3

Defects caught over all runs: a PR reviewed three times with one known bug shows 3/3 when it was caught every time.

Every bug each was scored on: GPT-6 Luna and Kimi K2.7 Code (Workers AI).