CodePanel

GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI)

Reading a 26.2K-token pull request costs $0.1048 on GPT-5.6 Sol, 11× the $0.0092 it costs on GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI). GPT-5.6 Sol is a frontier model and GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI) a economy one. In the benchmark GPT-5.6 Sol caught 32 percentage points more of the known defects than GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI) (95% interval +18 pts to +46 pts, a − b).

Side by side

GPT-5.6 Sol and GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI) side by side
FigureGPT-5.6 SolGPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI)
Price tierFrontierEconomy
Bugs caughtshare of known bugs72% (better)40%
False alarmsper clean PR1.2 (better)2.5
Cost per reviewmeasured$0.1127$0.0075 (better)
Cost per bug caught$0.1732$0.0189 (better)
Exact linecatches on the expected lines92% (better)49%
Review timemean50s (better)55s
Typical review calllist price$0.1532$0.011 (better)
Input / 1M tokens$4.00$0.35 (better)
Output / 1M tokens$20.00$0.75 (better)
Context window1.1M128K

Head to head

The known bugs both were scored on, by who caught each in at least one run.

Of 42 known bugs both were scored on: Both 26Only GPT-5.6 Sol 6Only GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI) 3Neither 7

By language

Share of known bugs each model caught, by language
ModelAllTypeScript6 bugsGo4 bugsJava4 bugsRust4 bugsC#3 bugsJavaScript3 bugsKotlin3 bugsPHP3 bugsPython3 bugsRuby3 bugsSwift3 bugsC++2 bugsC1 bug
GPT-5.6 Sol72%67%50%69%75%56%100%67%100%100%67%100%50%0%
GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI)40%42%13%46%71%41%11%44%33%78%33%44%33%0%

Where they differ

Of the 42 known bugs both were scored on, both caught 26 and neither caught 7. GPT-5.6 Sol caught 6 bugs that GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI) missed: 2 in JavaScript, 1 in Go, 1 in PHP, 1 in Swift and 1 in TypeScript. GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI) caught 3 bugs that GPT-5.6 Sol missed: 2 in TypeScript and 1 in Go.

On pull requests with no known bug, GPT-5.6 Sol raised 1.2 false alarms per review and GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI) 2.5. A measured review cost $0.1127 on GPT-5.6 Sol, 15× the cost of $0.0075 on GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI).

Each known bug, and how often each model caught it
Pull requestLanguage · kindGPT-5.6 SolGPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI)
colinhacks/zodfeat(v4): parse input containing reference cyclesTypeScript · Resource handling1/10/6
go-chi/chifeat: middleware.ClientIP, a replacement for middleware.RealIPGo · Security1/10/3
groue/GRDB.swiftDatabaseQueue and DatabaseSnapshot reads can access task localsSwift · Concurrency1/10/3
nodejs/undicifeat: add configurable maxPayloadSize for WebSocketJavaScript · Security1/10/3
sindresorhus/p-throttleAdd `weight` optionJavaScript · Logic1/10/3
symfony/symfony[Security] Allow multiple OIDC discovery endpointsPHP · Security1/10/3
go-gitea/giteaperf(gitdiff): optimize inline diff highlighting using cacheGo · Error handling0/11/3
trpc/trpcfix(server): pass maxDurationMs timeout signal to subscription handlersTypeScript · Concurrency0/11/3
withastro/astroPort Go's csrf protectionTypeScript · Logic0/15/6

Defects caught over all runs: a PR reviewed three times with one known bug shows 3/3 when it was caught every time.

Every bug each was scored on: GPT-5.6 Sol and GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI).