GLM-5.3 (Workers AI) vs Qwen3.7 Max
GLM-5.3 (Workers AI) reads a 26.2K-token pull request for $0.0367, 5% less than Qwen3.7 Max ($0.0387). Both sit in the mid-range price tier, so the choice between them is about review quality more than budget.
Side by side
| Figure | GLM-5.3 (Workers AI) | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Bugs caughtshare of known bugs | 61% | – |
| False alarmsper clean PR | 1.9 | – |
| Cost per reviewmeasured | $0.0311 | – |
| Cost per bug caught | $0.0559 | – |
| Exact linecatches on the expected lines | 85% | – |
| Review timemean | 65s | – |
| Typical review calllist price | $0.0473 (better) | $0.0494 |
| Input / 1M tokens | $1.40 (better) | $1.475 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $4.40 (better) | $4.425 |
| Context window | 1M | – |
Not benchmarked yet
Qwen3.7 Max isn't benchmarked yet, so this page compares list prices only. Measured bugs caught, false alarms and a bug-by-bug comparison appear here once both have results.
See measured models