CodePanel

GLM-5.3 (Workers AI) vs GPT-5.6 Sol

Reading a 26.2K-token pull request costs $0.1048 on GPT-5.6 Sol, 2.9× the $0.0367 it costs on GLM-5.3 (Workers AI). GLM-5.3 (Workers AI) is a mid-range model and GPT-5.6 Sol a frontier one. The benchmark cannot separate their recall: GLM-5.3 (Workers AI) minus GPT-5.6 Sol is −12 pts (95% interval −26 pts to +4 pts).

Side by side

GLM-5.3 (Workers AI) and GPT-5.6 Sol side by side
FigureGLM-5.3 (Workers AI)GPT-5.6 Sol
Price tierMid-rangeFrontier
Bugs caughtshare of known bugs61%72% (better)
False alarmsper clean PR1.91.2 (better)
Cost per reviewmeasured$0.0311 (better)$0.1127
Cost per bug caught$0.0559 (better)$0.1732
Exact linecatches on the expected lines85%92% (better)
Review timemean65s50s (better)
Typical review calllist price$0.0473 (better)$0.1532
Input / 1M tokens$1.40 (better)$4.00
Output / 1M tokens$4.40 (better)$20.00
Context window1M1.1M

Head to head

The known bugs both were scored on, by who caught each in at least one run.

Of 42 known bugs both were scored on: Both 29Only GLM-5.3 (Workers AI) 7Only GPT-5.6 Sol 3Neither 3

By language

Share of known bugs each model caught, by language
ModelAllTypeScript6 bugsGo4 bugsJava4 bugsRust4 bugsC#3 bugsJavaScript3 bugsKotlin3 bugsPHP3 bugsPython3 bugsRuby3 bugsSwift3 bugsC++2 bugsC1 bug
GLM-5.3 (Workers AI)61%78%19%46%73%48%33%72%44%58%67%100%100%67%
GPT-5.6 Sol72%67%50%69%75%56%100%67%100%100%67%100%50%0%

Where they differ

Of the 42 known bugs both were scored on, both caught 29 and neither caught 3. GLM-5.3 (Workers AI) caught 7 bugs that GPT-5.6 Sol missed: 2 in TypeScript, 1 in C, 1 in C++, 1 in Go, 1 in Kotlin and 1 in Rust. GPT-5.6 Sol caught 3 bugs that GLM-5.3 (Workers AI) missed: 1 in Go, 1 in JavaScript and 1 in PHP, most of them security bugs.

On pull requests with no known bug, GLM-5.3 (Workers AI) raised 1.9 false alarms per review and GPT-5.6 Sol 1.2. A measured review cost $0.0311 on GLM-5.3 (Workers AI), 72% less than $0.1127 on GPT-5.6 Sol.

Each known bug, and how often each model caught it
Pull requestLanguage · kindGLM-5.3 (Workers AI)GPT-5.6 Sol
ggml-org/llama.cpprpc : cache and reuse compute graphsC++ · Security3/30/1
withastro/astroPort Go's csrf protectionTypeScript · Logic4/40/1
c-ares/c-aresEvent Thread could stall when not notified of new queries on existing connections that are in a bad stateC · Resource handling2/30/1
kotest/kotestFix DataClassEq comparatorKotlin · Logic2/30/1
trpc/trpcfix(server): pass maxDurationMs timeout signal to subscription handlersTypeScript · Concurrency2/30/1
traefik/traefikAdd the option to define custom cipher suites for backend serversTransportGo · API misuse2/40/1
nushell/nushellreorganize nushell configurationRust · Error handling1/40/1
go-chi/chifeat: middleware.ClientIP, a replacement for middleware.RealIPGo · Security0/31/1
sindresorhus/p-throttleAdd `weight` optionJavaScript · Logic0/31/1
symfony/symfony[Security] Allow multiple OIDC discovery endpointsPHP · Security0/31/1

Defects caught over all runs: a PR reviewed three times with one known bug shows 3/3 when it was caught every time.

Every bug each was scored on: GLM-5.3 (Workers AI) and GPT-5.6 Sol.