CodePanel

GLM-5.3 Flash (Workers AI) vs GPT-6 Luna

GPT-6 Luna reads a 26.2K-token pull request for $0.0026, 33% less than GLM-5.3 Flash (Workers AI) ($0.0039). Above 272K tokens long-context rates apply, and GLM-5.3 Flash (Workers AI) becomes the cheaper one. Both sit in the economy price tier, so the choice between them is about review quality more than budget. The benchmark cannot separate their recall: GLM-5.3 Flash (Workers AI) minus GPT-6 Luna is −7 pts (95% interval −22 pts to +9 pts).

Side by side

GLM-5.3 Flash (Workers AI) and GPT-6 Luna side by side
FigureGLM-5.3 Flash (Workers AI)GPT-6 Luna
Price tierEconomyEconomy
Bugs caughtshare of known bugs61%67% (better)
False alarmsper clean PR1.80.7 (better)
Cost per reviewmeasured$0.0035$0.0028 (better)
Cost per bug caught$0.0066$0.0046 (better)
Exact linecatches on the expected lines89%97% (better)
Review timemean254s29s (better)
Typical review calllist price$0.0051$0.0038 (better)
Input / 1M tokens$0.15$0.10 (better)
Output / 1M tokens$0.50$0.50 (better)
Context window1M1.1M
  • Above 272K tokens, long-context rates mean GLM-5.3 Flash (Workers AI) is the cheaper of the two.

Head to head

The known bugs both were scored on, by who caught each in at least one run.

Of 42 known bugs both were scored on: Both 25Only GLM-5.3 Flash (Workers AI) 10Only GPT-6 Luna 4Neither 3

By language

Share of known bugs each model caught, by language
ModelAllTypeScript6 bugsGo4 bugsJava4 bugsRust4 bugsC#3 bugsJavaScript3 bugsKotlin3 bugsPHP3 bugsPython3 bugsRuby3 bugsSwift3 bugsC++2 bugsC1 bug
GLM-5.3 Flash (Workers AI)61%57%31%45%88%30%67%89%33%78%67%67%100%67%
GPT-6 Luna67%83%25%65%75%56%67%67%67%100%67%100%50%0%

Where they differ

Of the 42 known bugs both were scored on, both caught 25 and neither caught 3. GLM-5.3 Flash (Workers AI) caught 10 bugs that GPT-6 Luna missed: 2 in Go, 1 in C, 1 in C++, 1 in Java, 1 in JavaScript, 1 in Kotlin, 1 in Ruby, 1 in Rust and 1 in TypeScript. GPT-6 Luna caught 4 bugs that GLM-5.3 Flash (Workers AI) missed: 2 in TypeScript, 1 in Go and 1 in PHP.

On pull requests with no known bug, GLM-5.3 Flash (Workers AI) raised 1.8 false alarms per review and GPT-6 Luna 0.7. A measured review cost $0.0035 on GLM-5.3 Flash (Workers AI), 25% more than $0.0028 on GPT-6 Luna.

Each known bug, and how often each model caught it
Pull requestLanguage · kindGLM-5.3 Flash (Workers AI)GPT-6 Luna
ggml-org/llama.cpprpc : cache and reuse compute graphsC++ · Security3/30/1
golang/gocrypto/tls: add LocalCertificate to ConnectionStateGo · Logic3/40/1
withastro/astroPort Go's csrf protectionTypeScript · Logic3/40/1
c-ares/c-aresEvent Thread could stall when not notified of new queries on existing connections that are in a bad stateC · Resource handling2/30/1
kotest/kotestFix DataClassEq comparatorKotlin · Logic2/30/1
sindresorhus/p-throttleAdd `weight` optionJavaScript · Logic2/30/1
nushell/nushellreorganize nushell configurationRust · Error handling2/40/1
traefik/traefikAdd the option to define custom cipher suites for backend serversTransportGo · API misuse2/40/1
jhy/jsoupStore cached child els in Attributes, not fieldJava · Concurrency2/60/2
socketry/asyncBarrier wait in completion order + `Queue#close`.Ruby · Concurrency1/30/1
TanStack/queryfix(query-core): fix hydration bugs for already resolved promisesTypeScript · Logic0/41/1
colinhacks/zodfeat(v4): parse input containing reference cyclesTypeScript · Resource handling0/41/1
doctrine/ormFix collection filtering API for IN/NOT IN comparisons that require type conversionsPHP · Logic0/31/1
go-chi/chifeat: middleware.ClientIP, a replacement for middleware.RealIPGo · Security0/31/1

Defects caught over all runs: a PR reviewed three times with one known bug shows 3/3 when it was caught every time.

Every bug each was scored on: GLM-5.3 Flash (Workers AI) and GPT-6 Luna.