CodePanel

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI)

Reading a 26.2K-token pull request costs $0.0197 on Gemini 3.8 Flash, 2.1× the $0.0092 it costs on GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI). Gemini 3.8 Flash is a mid-range model and GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI) a economy one. The benchmark cannot separate their recall: Gemini 3.8 Flash minus GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI) is +28 pts (95% interval +13 pts to +42 pts).

Side by side

Gemini 3.8 Flash and GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI) side by side
FigureGemini 3.8 FlashGPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI)
Price tierMid-rangeEconomy
Bugs caughtshare of known bugs68% (better)40%
False alarmsper clean PR1.0 (better)2.5
Cost per reviewmeasured$0.0862$0.0075 (better)
Cost per bug caught$0.1166$0.0189 (better)
Exact linecatches on the expected lines94% (better)49%
Review timemean427s55s (better)
Typical review calllist price$0.0287$0.011 (better)
Input / 1M tokens$0.75$0.35 (better)
Output / 1M tokens$3.75$0.75 (better)
Context window1M128K

Head to head

The known bugs both were scored on, by who caught each in at least one run.

Of 42 known bugs both were scored on: Both 24Only Gemini 3.8 Flash 7Only GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI) 5Neither 6

By language

Share of known bugs each model caught, by language
ModelAllTypeScript6 bugsGo4 bugsJava4 bugsRust4 bugsC#3 bugsJavaScript3 bugsKotlin3 bugsPHP3 bugsPython3 bugsRuby3 bugsSwift3 bugsC++2 bugsC1 bug
Gemini 3.8 Flash68%83%75%43%75%78%67%0%50%83%100%100%50%50%
GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI)40%42%13%46%71%41%11%44%33%78%33%44%33%0%

Where they differ

Of the 42 known bugs both were scored on, both caught 24 and neither caught 6. Gemini 3.8 Flash caught 7 bugs that GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI) missed: 2 in Go, 1 in C, 1 in C#, 1 in JavaScript, 1 in Ruby and 1 in Swift. GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI) caught 5 bugs that Gemini 3.8 Flash missed: 2 in Java, 2 in Kotlin and 1 in Go.

On pull requests with no known bug, Gemini 3.8 Flash raised 1 false alarms per review and GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI) 2.5. A measured review cost $0.0862 on Gemini 3.8 Flash, 11× the cost of $0.0075 on GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI).

Each known bug, and how often each model caught it
Pull requestLanguage · kindGemini 3.8 FlashGPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI)
dotnet/orleansfix(serialization): cap codec allocationsC# · Logic1/10/3
go-chi/chifeat: middleware.ClientIP, a replacement for middleware.RealIPGo · Security1/10/3
groue/GRDB.swiftDatabaseQueue and DatabaseSnapshot reads can access task localsSwift · Concurrency2/20/3
rails/railsReimplement Action Cable redis adapter with redis-clientRuby · Logic1/10/3
sindresorhus/p-throttleAdd `weight` optionJavaScript · Logic1/10/3
traefik/traefikAdd the option to define custom cipher suites for backend serversTransportGo · API misuse1/10/6
c-ares/c-aresEvent Thread could stall when not notified of new queries on existing connections that are in a bad stateC · Resource handling1/20/3
go-gitea/giteaperf(gitdiff): optimize inline diff highlighting using cacheGo · Error handling0/11/3
jhy/jsoupStore cached child els in Attributes, not fieldJava · Concurrency0/43/6
kotest/kotestRefactor eventually to ensure wall-clock time usageKotlin · Error handling0/13/3
ktorio/ktorKTOR-9171 Redesign ByteReadChannel.readUTF8Line APIKotlin · Logic0/12/6
mockito/mockitoAdd core API to enable Kotlin singleton mockingJava · API misuse0/11/6

Defects caught over all runs: a PR reviewed three times with one known bug shows 3/3 when it was caught every time.

Every bug each was scored on: Gemini 3.8 Flash and GPT-OSS 120B (Workers AI).