CodePanel

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Kimi K2.7 Code (Workers AI)

Reading a 26.2K-token pull request costs $0.0524 on Gemini 3.1 Pro, 2.1× the $0.0249 it costs on Kimi K2.7 Code (Workers AI). Both sit in the mid-range price tier, so the choice between them is about review quality more than budget. In the benchmark Gemini 3.1 Pro caught 30 percentage points more of the known defects than Kimi K2.7 Code (Workers AI) (95% interval +16 pts to +44 pts, a − b).

Side by side

Gemini 3.1 Pro and Kimi K2.7 Code (Workers AI) side by side
FigureGemini 3.1 ProKimi K2.7 Code (Workers AI)
Price tierMid-rangeMid-range
Bugs caughtshare of known bugs67% (better)38%
False alarmsper clean PR0.8 (better)2.6
Cost per reviewmeasured$0.2499$0.0567 (better)
Cost per bug caught$0.4134$0.0805 (better)
Exact linecatches on the expected lines89% (better)79%
Review timemean349s (better)610s
Typical review calllist price$0.0814$0.0346 (better)
Input / 1M tokens$2.00$0.95 (better)
Output / 1M tokens$12.00$4.00 (better)
Context window1M262.1K

Head to head

The known bugs both were scored on, by who caught each in at least one run.

Of 42 known bugs both were scored on: Both 27Only Gemini 3.1 Pro 5Only Kimi K2.7 Code (Workers AI) 6Neither 4

By language

Share of known bugs each model caught, by language
ModelAllTypeScript6 bugsGo4 bugsJava4 bugsRust4 bugsC#3 bugsJavaScript3 bugsKotlin3 bugsPHP3 bugsPython3 bugsRuby3 bugsSwift3 bugsC++2 bugsC1 bug
Gemini 3.1 Pro67%67%38%78%88%56%33%67%67%67%100%100%50%50%
Kimi K2.7 Code (Workers AI)38%75%26%31%46%19%8%14%42%62%33%46%6%40%

Where they differ

Of the 42 known bugs both were scored on, both caught 27 and neither caught 4. Gemini 3.1 Pro caught 5 bugs that Kimi K2.7 Code (Workers AI) missed: 2 in Ruby, 1 in Java, 1 in JavaScript and 1 in Rust, most of them concurrency bugs. Kimi K2.7 Code (Workers AI) caught 6 bugs that Gemini 3.1 Pro missed: 2 in TypeScript, 1 in Go, 1 in JavaScript, 1 in Kotlin and 1 in PHP.

On pull requests with no known bug, Gemini 3.1 Pro raised 0.8 false alarms per review and Kimi K2.7 Code (Workers AI) 2.6. A measured review cost $0.2499 on Gemini 3.1 Pro, 4.4× the cost of $0.0567 on Kimi K2.7 Code (Workers AI).

Each known bug, and how often each model caught it
Pull requestLanguage · kindGemini 3.1 ProKimi K2.7 Code (Workers AI)
denoland/denoperf(libs/core): poll only ready handles and yield between I/O batchesRust · Concurrency2/20/5
pinojs/thread-streamrefactor: replace setTimeout with Atomics.waitAsyncJavaScript · Concurrency1/10/8
rails/railsReimplement Action Cable redis adapter with redis-clientRuby · Logic1/10/5
socketry/asyncBarrier wait in completion order + `Queue#close`.Ruby · Concurrency2/20/5
jhy/jsoupStore cached child els in Attributes, not fieldJava · Concurrency1/20/16
TanStack/queryfix(query-core): fix hydration bugs for already resolved promisesTypeScript · Logic0/12/3
colinhacks/zodfeat(v4): parse input containing reference cyclesTypeScript · Resource handling0/11/3
go-gitea/giteaperf(gitdiff): optimize inline diff highlighting using cacheGo · Error handling0/11/4
kotest/kotestFix DataClassEq comparatorKotlin · Logic0/11/7
nodejs/undicifeat: add configurable maxPayloadSize for WebSocketJavaScript · Security0/11/4
symfony/symfony[Security] Allow multiple OIDC discovery endpointsPHP · Security0/11/4

Defects caught over all runs: a PR reviewed three times with one known bug shows 3/3 when it was caught every time.

Every bug each was scored on: Gemini 3.1 Pro and Kimi K2.7 Code (Workers AI).