CodePanel

DeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

DeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI) reads a 26.2K-token pull request for $0.0346, 34% less than Gemini 3.1 Pro ($0.0524). Both sit in the mid-range price tier, so the choice between them is about review quality more than budget. The benchmark cannot separate their recall: DeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI) minus Gemini 3.1 Pro is −13 pts (95% interval −26 pts to −1 pt).

Side by side

DeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI) and Gemini 3.1 Pro side by side
FigureDeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI)Gemini 3.1 Pro
Price tierMid-rangeMid-range
Bugs caughtshare of known bugs54%67% (better)
False alarmsper clean PR2.90.8 (better)
Cost per reviewmeasured$0.0643 (better)$0.2499
Cost per bug caught$0.0872 (better)$0.4134
Exact linecatches on the expected lines89%89% (better)
Review timemean390s349s (better)
Typical review calllist price$0.0442 (better)$0.0814
Input / 1M tokens$1.32 (better)$2.00
Output / 1M tokens$3.96 (better)$12.00
Context window1M1M

Head to head

The known bugs both were scored on, by who caught each in at least one run.

Of 42 known bugs both were scored on: Both 29Only DeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI) 5Only Gemini 3.1 Pro 3Neither 5

By language

Share of known bugs each model caught, by language
ModelAllTypeScript6 bugsGo4 bugsJava4 bugsRust4 bugsC#3 bugsJavaScript3 bugsKotlin3 bugsPHP3 bugsPython3 bugsRuby3 bugsSwift3 bugsC++2 bugsC1 bug
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI)54%79%25%49%54%59%17%30%69%72%67%75%38%33%
Gemini 3.1 Pro67%67%38%78%88%56%33%67%67%67%100%100%50%50%

Where they differ

Of the 42 known bugs both were scored on, both caught 29 and neither caught 5. DeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI) caught 5 bugs that Gemini 3.1 Pro missed: 1 in C++, 1 in JavaScript, 1 in Kotlin, 1 in PHP and 1 in TypeScript, most of them security bugs. Gemini 3.1 Pro caught 3 bugs that DeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI) missed: 1 in Go, 1 in JavaScript and 1 in Rust, most of them concurrency bugs.

On pull requests with no known bug, DeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI) raised 2.9 false alarms per review and Gemini 3.1 Pro 0.8. A measured review cost $0.0643 on DeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI), 74% less than $0.2499 on Gemini 3.1 Pro.

Each known bug, and how often each model caught it
Pull requestLanguage · kindDeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI)Gemini 3.1 Pro
TanStack/queryfix(query-core): fix hydration bugs for already resolved promisesTypeScript · Logic3/40/1
kotest/kotestFix DataClassEq comparatorKotlin · Logic2/40/1
nodejs/undicifeat: add configurable maxPayloadSize for WebSocketJavaScript · Security2/40/1
symfony/symfony[Security] Allow multiple OIDC discovery endpointsPHP · Security1/30/1
ggml-org/llama.cpprpc : cache and reuse compute graphsC++ · Security1/40/1
denoland/denoperf(libs/core): poll only ready handles and yield between I/O batchesRust · Concurrency0/42/2
golang/gocrypto/tls: add LocalCertificate to ConnectionStateGo · Logic0/41/2
pinojs/thread-streamrefactor: replace setTimeout with Atomics.waitAsyncJavaScript · Concurrency0/41/1

Defects caught over all runs: a PR reviewed three times with one known bug shows 3/3 when it was caught every time.

Every bug each was scored on: DeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI) and Gemini 3.1 Pro.