DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI) vs Inkling Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI) and Inkling Small charge practically the same to read a 26.2K-token pull request ($0.0115). Both sit in the economy price tier, so the choice between them is about review quality more than budget.
Side by side
| Figure | DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI) | Inkling Small |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Economy | Economy |
| Bugs caughtshare of known bugs | 49% | – |
| False alarmsper clean PR | 1.3 | – |
| Cost per reviewmeasured | $0.0178 | – |
| Cost per bug caught | $0.0309 | – |
| Exact linecatches on the expected lines | 88% | – |
| Review timemean | 137s | – |
| Typical review calllist price | $0.0147 | $0.0147 (better) |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.44 (better) | $0.45 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $1.32 | $1.20 (better) |
| Context window | 1M | – |
Not benchmarked yet
Inkling Small isn't benchmarked yet, so this page compares list prices only. Measured bugs caught, false alarms and a bug-by-bug comparison appear here once both have results.
See measured models