CodePanel

DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI) vs GPT-6 Luna

Reading a 26.2K-token pull request costs $0.0115 on DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI), 4.4× the $0.0026 it costs on GPT-6 Luna. Both sit in the economy price tier, so the choice between them is about review quality more than budget. The benchmark cannot separate their recall: DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI) minus GPT-6 Luna is −19 pts (95% interval −33 pts to −5 pts).

Side by side

DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI) and GPT-6 Luna side by side
FigureDeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI)GPT-6 Luna
Price tierEconomyEconomy
Bugs caughtshare of known bugs49%67% (better)
False alarmsper clean PR1.30.7 (better)
Cost per reviewmeasured$0.0178$0.0028 (better)
Cost per bug caught$0.0309$0.0046 (better)
Exact linecatches on the expected lines88%97% (better)
Review timemean137s29s (better)
Typical review calllist price$0.0147$0.0038 (better)
Input / 1M tokens$0.44$0.10 (better)
Output / 1M tokens$1.32$0.50 (better)
Context window1M1.1M

Head to head

The known bugs both were scored on, by who caught each in at least one run.

Of 42 known bugs both were scored on: Both 23Only DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI) 7Only GPT-6 Luna 6Neither 6

By language

Share of known bugs each model caught, by language
ModelAllTypeScript6 bugsGo4 bugsJava4 bugsRust4 bugsC#3 bugsJavaScript3 bugsKotlin3 bugsPHP3 bugsPython3 bugsRuby3 bugsSwift3 bugsC++2 bugsC1 bug
DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI)49%46%25%55%46%22%56%61%78%61%44%67%50%0%
GPT-6 Luna67%83%25%65%75%56%67%67%67%100%67%100%50%0%

Where they differ

Of the 42 known bugs both were scored on, both caught 23 and neither caught 6. DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI) caught 7 bugs that GPT-6 Luna missed: 2 in Go, 1 in Java, 1 in Kotlin, 1 in PHP, 1 in Ruby and 1 in TypeScript. GPT-6 Luna caught 6 bugs that DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI) missed: 3 in TypeScript, 1 in C#, 1 in Go and 1 in Ruby.

On pull requests with no known bug, DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI) raised 1.3 false alarms per review and GPT-6 Luna 0.7. A measured review cost $0.0178 on DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI), 6.3× the cost of $0.0028 on GPT-6 Luna.

Each known bug, and how often each model caught it
Pull requestLanguage · kindDeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI)GPT-6 Luna
golang/gocrypto/tls: add LocalCertificate to ConnectionStateGo · Logic3/40/1
withastro/astroPort Go's csrf protectionTypeScript · Logic3/40/1
socketry/asyncBarrier wait in completion order + `Queue#close`.Ruby · Concurrency2/30/1
jhy/jsoupStore cached child els in Attributes, not fieldJava · Concurrency2/60/2
kotest/kotestFix DataClassEq comparatorKotlin · Logic1/30/1
symfony/symfony[Security] Allow multiple OIDC discovery endpointsPHP · Security1/30/1
traefik/traefikAdd the option to define custom cipher suites for backend serversTransportGo · API misuse1/40/1
OrchardCMS/OrchardCoreSimplify using `StringValues` in Liquid templatesC# · Security0/31/1
TanStack/queryfix(query-core): fix hydration bugs for already resolved promisesTypeScript · Logic0/41/1
colinhacks/zodfeat(v4): parse input containing reference cyclesTypeScript · Resource handling0/41/1
go-chi/chifeat: middleware.ClientIP, a replacement for middleware.RealIPGo · Security0/31/1
rails/railsReimplement Action Cable redis adapter with redis-clientRuby · Logic0/31/1
trpc/trpcfix(server): pass maxDurationMs timeout signal to subscription handlersTypeScript · Concurrency0/11/1

Defects caught over all runs: a PR reviewed three times with one known bug shows 3/3 when it was caught every time.

Every bug each was scored on: DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI) and GPT-6 Luna.