CodePanel

DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI) vs Gemini 3.8 Flash

DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI) reads a 26.2K-token pull request for $0.0115, 41% less than Gemini 3.8 Flash ($0.0197). DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI) is a economy model and Gemini 3.8 Flash a mid-range one. The benchmark cannot separate their recall: DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI) minus Gemini 3.8 Flash is −19 pts (95% interval −35 pts to −4 pts).

Side by side

DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI) and Gemini 3.8 Flash side by side
FigureDeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI)Gemini 3.8 Flash
Price tierEconomyMid-range
Bugs caughtshare of known bugs49%68% (better)
False alarmsper clean PR1.31.0 (better)
Cost per reviewmeasured$0.0178 (better)$0.0862
Cost per bug caught$0.0309 (better)$0.1166
Exact linecatches on the expected lines88%94% (better)
Review timemean137s (better)427s
Typical review calllist price$0.0147 (better)$0.0287
Input / 1M tokens$0.44 (better)$0.75
Output / 1M tokens$1.32 (better)$3.75
Context window1M1M

Head to head

The known bugs both were scored on, by who caught each in at least one run.

Of 42 known bugs both were scored on: Both 23Only DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI) 7Only Gemini 3.8 Flash 8Neither 4

By language

Share of known bugs each model caught, by language
ModelAllTypeScript6 bugsGo4 bugsJava4 bugsRust4 bugsC#3 bugsJavaScript3 bugsKotlin3 bugsPHP3 bugsPython3 bugsRuby3 bugsSwift3 bugsC++2 bugsC1 bug
DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI)49%46%25%55%46%22%56%61%78%61%44%67%50%0%
Gemini 3.8 Flash68%83%75%43%75%78%67%0%50%83%100%100%50%50%

Where they differ

Of the 42 known bugs both were scored on, both caught 23 and neither caught 4. DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI) caught 7 bugs that Gemini 3.8 Flash missed: 3 in Kotlin, 2 in Java, 1 in JavaScript and 1 in PHP. Gemini 3.8 Flash caught 8 bugs that DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI) missed: 2 in C#, 2 in TypeScript, 1 in C, 1 in Go, 1 in JavaScript and 1 in Ruby.

On pull requests with no known bug, DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI) raised 1.3 false alarms per review and Gemini 3.8 Flash 1. A measured review cost $0.0178 on DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI), 79% less than $0.0862 on Gemini 3.8 Flash.

Each known bug, and how often each model caught it
Pull requestLanguage · kindDeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI)Gemini 3.8 Flash
kotest/kotestRefactor eventually to ensure wall-clock time usageKotlin · Error handling3/30/1
nodejs/undicifeat: add configurable maxPayloadSize for WebSocketJavaScript · Security2/30/1
ktorio/ktorKTOR-9171 Redesign ByteReadChannel.readUTF8Line APIKotlin · Logic3/60/1
jhy/jsoupStore cached child els in Attributes, not fieldJava · Concurrency2/60/4
kotest/kotestFix DataClassEq comparatorKotlin · Logic1/30/1
symfony/symfony[Security] Allow multiple OIDC discovery endpointsPHP · Security1/30/1
mockito/mockitoAdd core API to enable Kotlin singleton mockingJava · API misuse1/40/1
OrchardCMS/OrchardCoreSimplify using `StringValues` in Liquid templatesC# · Security0/31/1
TanStack/queryfix(query-core): fix hydration bugs for already resolved promisesTypeScript · Logic0/41/1
c-ares/c-aresEvent Thread could stall when not notified of new queries on existing connections that are in a bad stateC · Resource handling0/31/2
dotnet/orleansfix(serialization): cap codec allocationsC# · Logic0/31/1
go-chi/chifeat: middleware.ClientIP, a replacement for middleware.RealIPGo · Security0/31/1
rails/railsReimplement Action Cable redis adapter with redis-clientRuby · Logic0/31/1
sindresorhus/p-throttleAdd `weight` optionJavaScript · Logic0/31/1
trpc/trpcfix(server): pass maxDurationMs timeout signal to subscription handlersTypeScript · Concurrency0/11/1

Defects caught over all runs: a PR reviewed three times with one known bug shows 3/3 when it was caught every time.

Every bug each was scored on: DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI) and Gemini 3.8 Flash.