CodePanel

DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI)

Reading a 26.2K-token pull request costs $0.0346 on DeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI), 3.0× the $0.0115 it costs on DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI). DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI) is a economy model and DeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI) a mid-range one. The benchmark cannot separate their recall: DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI) minus DeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI) is −5 pts (95% interval −18 pts to +8 pts).

Side by side

DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI) and DeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI) side by side
FigureDeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI)DeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI)
Price tierEconomyMid-range
Bugs caughtshare of known bugs49%54% (better)
False alarmsper clean PR1.3 (better)2.9
Cost per reviewmeasured$0.0178 (better)$0.0643
Cost per bug caught$0.0309 (better)$0.0872
Exact linecatches on the expected lines88%89% (better)
Review timemean137s (better)390s
Typical review calllist price$0.0147 (better)$0.0442
Input / 1M tokens$0.44 (better)$1.32
Output / 1M tokens$1.32 (better)$3.96
Context window1M1M

Head to head

The known bugs both were scored on, by who caught each in at least one run.

Of 42 known bugs both were scored on: Both 27Only DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI) 3Only DeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI) 7Neither 5

By language

Share of known bugs each model caught, by language
ModelAllTypeScript6 bugsGo4 bugsJava4 bugsRust4 bugsC#3 bugsJavaScript3 bugsKotlin3 bugsPHP3 bugsPython3 bugsRuby3 bugsSwift3 bugsC++2 bugsC1 bug
DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI)49%46%25%55%46%22%56%61%78%61%44%67%50%0%
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI)54%79%25%49%54%59%17%30%69%72%67%75%38%33%

Where they differ

Of the 42 known bugs both were scored on, both caught 27 and neither caught 5. DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI) caught 3 bugs that DeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI) missed: 1 in Go, 1 in JavaScript and 1 in Rust, most of them concurrency bugs. DeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI) caught 7 bugs that DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI) missed: 2 in TypeScript, 1 in C, 1 in C++, 1 in C#, 1 in Ruby and 1 in Rust.

On pull requests with no known bug, DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI) raised 1.3 false alarms per review and DeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI) 2.9. A measured review cost $0.0178 on DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI), 72% less than $0.0643 on DeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI).

Each known bug, and how often each model caught it
Pull requestLanguage · kindDeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI)DeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI)
pinojs/thread-streamrefactor: replace setTimeout with Atomics.waitAsyncJavaScript · Concurrency3/30/4
golang/gocrypto/tls: add LocalCertificate to ConnectionStateGo · Logic3/40/4
denoland/denoperf(libs/core): poll only ready handles and yield between I/O batchesRust · Concurrency1/30/4
OrchardCMS/OrchardCoreSimplify using `StringValues` in Liquid templatesC# · Security0/33/3
TanStack/queryfix(query-core): fix hydration bugs for already resolved promisesTypeScript · Logic0/43/4
c-ares/c-aresEvent Thread could stall when not notified of new queries on existing connections that are in a bad stateC · Resource handling0/31/3
ggml-org/llama.cpprpc : cache and reuse compute graphsC++ · Security0/31/4
nushell/nushellreorganize nushell configurationRust · Error handling0/43/4
rails/railsReimplement Action Cable redis adapter with redis-clientRuby · Logic0/32/4
trpc/trpcfix(server): pass maxDurationMs timeout signal to subscription handlersTypeScript · Concurrency0/12/2

Defects caught over all runs: a PR reviewed three times with one known bug shows 3/3 when it was caught every time.

Every bug each was scored on: DeepSeek V4 Flash (Workers AI) and DeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI).