Claude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol
Claude Sonnet 5 and GPT-6.1 Sol charge practically the same to read a 26.2K-token pull request ($0.0524). Above 272K tokens long-context rates apply, and Claude Sonnet 5 becomes the cheaper one. Both sit in the mid-range price tier, so the choice between them is about review quality more than budget.
Side by side
| Figure | Claude Sonnet 5 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Bugs caughtshare of known bugs | – | 89% |
| False alarmsper clean PR | – | 0.9 |
| Cost per reviewmeasured | – | $0.0401 |
| Cost per bug caught | – | $0.0514 |
| Exact linecatches on the expected lines | – | 95% |
| Review timemean | – | 28s |
| Typical review calllist price | $0.0766 | $0.0766 |
| Input / 1M tokens | $2.00 | $2.00 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $10.00 | $10.00 |
| Context window | 1M | 1.1M |
- Above 272K tokens, long-context rates mean Claude Sonnet 5 is the cheaper of the two.
Not benchmarked yet
Claude Sonnet 5 isn't benchmarked yet, so this page compares list prices only. Measured bugs caught, false alarms and a bug-by-bug comparison appear here once both have results.
See measured models