CodePanel

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro charge practically the same to read a 26.2K-token pull request ($0.0524). Above 200K tokens long-context rates apply, and Claude Sonnet 5.5 becomes the cheaper one. Both sit in the mid-range price tier, so the choice between them is about review quality more than budget. The benchmark cannot separate their recall: Claude Sonnet 5.5 minus Gemini 3.1 Pro is +10 pts (95% interval −6 pts to +27 pts).

Side by side

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro side by side
FigureClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemini 3.1 Pro
Price tierMid-rangeMid-range
Bugs caughtshare of known bugs77% (better)67%
False alarmsper clean PR2.00.8 (better)
Cost per reviewmeasured$0.0571 (better)$0.2499
Cost per bug caught$0.083 (better)$0.4134
Exact linecatches on the expected lines82%89% (better)
Review timemean11s (better)349s
Typical review calllist price$0.0766 (better)$0.0814
Input / 1M tokens$2.00$2.00
Output / 1M tokens$10.00 (better)$12.00
Context window1M1M
  • Above 200K tokens, long-context rates mean Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the cheaper of the two.

Head to head

The known bugs both were scored on, by who caught each in at least one run.

Of 42 known bugs both were scored on: Both 26Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 7Only Gemini 3.1 Pro 6Neither 3

By language

Share of known bugs each model caught, by language
ModelAllTypeScript6 bugsGo4 bugsJava4 bugsRust4 bugsC#3 bugsJavaScript3 bugsKotlin3 bugsPHP3 bugsPython3 bugsRuby3 bugsSwift3 bugsC++2 bugsC1 bug
Claude Sonnet 5.577%83%50%45%100%56%100%67%67%67%100%100%100%100%
Gemini 3.1 Pro67%67%38%78%88%56%33%67%67%67%100%100%50%50%

Where they differ

Of the 42 known bugs both were scored on, both caught 26 and neither caught 3. Claude Sonnet 5.5 caught 7 bugs that Gemini 3.1 Pro missed: 2 in JavaScript, 1 in C++, 1 in Go, 1 in Kotlin, 1 in PHP and 1 in TypeScript, most of them security bugs. Gemini 3.1 Pro caught 6 bugs that Claude Sonnet 5.5 missed: 2 in Java, 1 in Go, 1 in Kotlin, 1 in PHP and 1 in Python.

On pull requests with no known bug, Claude Sonnet 5.5 raised 2 false alarms per review and Gemini 3.1 Pro 0.8. A measured review cost $0.0571 on Claude Sonnet 5.5, 77% less than $0.2499 on Gemini 3.1 Pro.

Each known bug, and how often each model caught it
Pull requestLanguage · kindClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemini 3.1 Pro
colinhacks/zodfeat(v4): parse input containing reference cyclesTypeScript · Resource handling1/10/1
ggml-org/llama.cpprpc : cache and reuse compute graphsC++ · Security1/10/1
go-chi/chifeat: middleware.ClientIP, a replacement for middleware.RealIPGo · Security1/10/1
kotest/kotestFix DataClassEq comparatorKotlin · Logic1/10/1
nodejs/undicifeat: add configurable maxPayloadSize for WebSocketJavaScript · Security1/10/1
sindresorhus/p-throttleAdd `weight` optionJavaScript · Logic1/10/1
symfony/symfony[Security] Allow multiple OIDC discovery endpointsPHP · Security1/10/1
aio-libs/aiohttpkeep websocket compression state across interleaved control framesPython · Logic0/11/2
doctrine/ormFix collection filtering API for IN/NOT IN comparisons that require type conversionsPHP · Logic0/11/1
iBotPeaches/Apktoolrefactor: Improve renaming/injection of resources in stripped APKsJava · Security0/12/2
jhy/jsoupStore cached child els in Attributes, not fieldJava · Concurrency0/21/2
ktorio/ktorKTOR-9171 Redesign ByteReadChannel.readUTF8Line APIKotlin · Logic0/11/1
traefik/traefikAdd the option to define custom cipher suites for backend serversTransportGo · API misuse0/11/1

Defects caught over all runs: a PR reviewed three times with one known bug shows 3/3 when it was caught every time.

Every bug each was scored on: Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro.