CodePanel

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI)

DeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI) reads a 26.2K-token pull request for $0.0346, 34% less than Claude Sonnet 5.5 ($0.0524). Both sit in the mid-range price tier, so the choice between them is about review quality more than budget. The benchmark cannot separate their recall: Claude Sonnet 5.5 minus DeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI) is +23 pts (95% interval +7 pts to +39 pts).

Side by side

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI) side by side
FigureClaude Sonnet 5.5DeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI)
Price tierMid-rangeMid-range
Bugs caughtshare of known bugs77% (better)54%
False alarmsper clean PR2.0 (better)2.9
Cost per reviewmeasured$0.0571 (better)$0.0643
Cost per bug caught$0.083 (better)$0.0872
Exact linecatches on the expected lines82%89% (better)
Review timemean11s (better)390s
Typical review calllist price$0.0766$0.0442 (better)
Input / 1M tokens$2.00$1.32 (better)
Output / 1M tokens$10.00$3.96 (better)
Context window1M1M

Head to head

The known bugs both were scored on, by who caught each in at least one run.

Of 42 known bugs both were scored on: Both 27Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 6Only DeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI) 7Neither 2

By language

Share of known bugs each model caught, by language
ModelAllTypeScript6 bugsGo4 bugsJava4 bugsRust4 bugsC#3 bugsJavaScript3 bugsKotlin3 bugsPHP3 bugsPython3 bugsRuby3 bugsSwift3 bugsC++2 bugsC1 bug
Claude Sonnet 5.577%83%50%45%100%56%100%67%67%67%100%100%100%100%
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI)54%79%25%49%54%59%17%30%69%72%67%75%38%33%

Where they differ

Of the 42 known bugs both were scored on, both caught 27 and neither caught 2. Claude Sonnet 5.5 caught 6 bugs that DeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI) missed: 2 in Go, 2 in JavaScript, 1 in Rust and 1 in TypeScript. DeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI) caught 7 bugs that Claude Sonnet 5.5 missed: 2 in Java, 1 in Go, 1 in Kotlin, 1 in PHP, 1 in Python and 1 in TypeScript, most of them logic bugs.

On pull requests with no known bug, Claude Sonnet 5.5 raised 2 false alarms per review and DeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI) 2.9. A measured review cost $0.0571 on Claude Sonnet 5.5, 11% less than $0.0643 on DeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI).

Each known bug, and how often each model caught it
Pull requestLanguage · kindClaude Sonnet 5.5DeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI)
colinhacks/zodfeat(v4): parse input containing reference cyclesTypeScript · Resource handling1/10/4
denoland/denoperf(libs/core): poll only ready handles and yield between I/O batchesRust · Concurrency1/10/4
go-chi/chifeat: middleware.ClientIP, a replacement for middleware.RealIPGo · Security1/10/4
golang/gocrypto/tls: add LocalCertificate to ConnectionStateGo · Logic1/10/4
pinojs/thread-streamrefactor: replace setTimeout with Atomics.waitAsyncJavaScript · Concurrency1/10/4
sindresorhus/p-throttleAdd `weight` optionJavaScript · Logic1/10/4
TanStack/queryfix(query-core): fix hydration bugs for already resolved promisesTypeScript · Logic0/13/4
aio-libs/aiohttpkeep websocket compression state across interleaved control framesPython · Logic0/14/4
doctrine/ormFix collection filtering API for IN/NOT IN comparisons that require type conversionsPHP · Logic0/13/4
iBotPeaches/Apktoolrefactor: Improve renaming/injection of resources in stripped APKsJava · Security0/12/3
jhy/jsoupStore cached child els in Attributes, not fieldJava · Concurrency0/23/6
ktorio/ktorKTOR-9171 Redesign ByteReadChannel.readUTF8Line APIKotlin · Logic0/11/7
traefik/traefikAdd the option to define custom cipher suites for backend serversTransportGo · API misuse0/14/4

Defects caught over all runs: a PR reviewed three times with one known bug shows 3/3 when it was caught every time.

Every bug each was scored on: Claude Sonnet 5.5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro (Workers AI).