CodePanel

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5

Reading a 26.2K-token pull request costs $0.1048 on Claude Opus 5.5, 2.0× the $0.0524 it costs on Claude Sonnet 5.5. Claude Opus 5.5 is a frontier model and Claude Sonnet 5.5 a mid-range one. The benchmark cannot separate their recall: Claude Opus 5.5 minus Claude Sonnet 5.5 is +13 pts (95% interval −1 pt to +27 pts).

Side by side

Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Sonnet 5.5 side by side
FigureClaude Opus 5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5
Price tierFrontierMid-range
Bugs caughtshare of known bugs90% (better)77%
False alarmsper clean PR1.7 (better)2.0
Cost per reviewmeasured$0.1525$0.0571 (better)
Cost per bug caught$0.1921$0.083 (better)
Exact linecatches on the expected lines89% (better)82%
Review timemean33s11s (better)
Typical review calllist price$0.1532$0.0766 (better)
Input / 1M tokens$4.00$2.00 (better)
Output / 1M tokens$20.00$10.00 (better)
Context window1M1M

Head to head

The known bugs both were scored on, by who caught each in at least one run.

Of 42 known bugs both were scored on: Both 31Only Claude Opus 5.5 8Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 2Neither 1

By language

Share of known bugs each model caught, by language
ModelAllTypeScript6 bugsGo4 bugsJava4 bugsRust4 bugsC#3 bugsJavaScript3 bugsKotlin3 bugsPHP3 bugsPython3 bugsRuby3 bugsSwift3 bugsC++2 bugsC1 bug
Claude Opus 5.590%100%50%78%100%100%100%67%100%100%89%100%100%100%
Claude Sonnet 5.577%83%50%45%100%56%100%67%67%67%100%100%100%100%

Where they differ

Of the 42 known bugs both were scored on, both caught 31 and neither caught 1. Claude Opus 5.5 caught 8 bugs that Claude Sonnet 5.5 missed: 2 in Java, 1 in C#, 1 in Go, 1 in Kotlin, 1 in PHP, 1 in Python and 1 in TypeScript, most of them logic bugs. Claude Sonnet 5.5 caught 2 bugs that Claude Opus 5.5 missed: 1 in Go and 1 in Kotlin.

On pull requests with no known bug, Claude Opus 5.5 raised 1.7 false alarms per review and Claude Sonnet 5.5 2. A measured review cost $0.1525 on Claude Opus 5.5, 2.7× the cost of $0.0571 on Claude Sonnet 5.5.

Each known bug, and how often each model caught it
Pull requestLanguage · kindClaude Opus 5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5
TanStack/queryfix(query-core): fix hydration bugs for already resolved promisesTypeScript · Logic1/10/1
aio-libs/aiohttpkeep websocket compression state across interleaved control framesPython · Logic1/10/1
doctrine/ormFix collection filtering API for IN/NOT IN comparisons that require type conversionsPHP · Logic1/10/1
dotnet/orleansfix(serialization): cap codec allocationsC# · Logic1/10/1
iBotPeaches/Apktoolrefactor: Improve renaming/injection of resources in stripped APKsJava · Security1/10/1
ktorio/ktorKTOR-9171 Redesign ByteReadChannel.readUTF8Line APIKotlin · Logic1/10/1
traefik/traefikAdd the option to define custom cipher suites for backend serversTransportGo · API misuse1/10/1
jhy/jsoupStore cached child els in Attributes, not fieldJava · Concurrency1/20/2
go-chi/chifeat: middleware.ClientIP, a replacement for middleware.RealIPGo · Security0/11/1
kotest/kotestFix DataClassEq comparatorKotlin · Logic0/11/1

Defects caught over all runs: a PR reviewed three times with one known bug shows 3/3 when it was caught every time.

Every bug each was scored on: Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Sonnet 5.5.